Posts

With a sufficient number of users of an API, it does not matter what you promise in the contract: all observable behaviors of your system will be depended on by somebody. — Hyrum's Law

In a compiler, the most common form of Hyrum's Law is dependence on unspecified behavior — hash bucket order, the order of equal elements after std::sort, padding offsets. The same framing covers a few cases that are technically undefined behavior (use of an invalidated iterator) or plain incidental properties (ABI struct layout, ELF section offsets).

When the compiler itself harbors such a dependency, the symptom is usually output that varies build-to-build: an unstable sort that lands differently after the standard library changes, a hash map whose iteration order shifts when the hash function does. Occasionally the variation is run-to-run within a single build — DenseMap<void *, X> keys with an ASLR-derived seed reorder buckets each invocation. Either way, reproducible builds, bisection, and bug reports all assume same input → same output, and a stealth Hyrum dependency breaks that.

This post surveys some mechanisms that perturb the contract's blind spots so dependencies cannot quietly form.

Updated in 2026-05.

Since the LLVM 22 branch was cut, I've landed patches that parallelize more link phases and cut task-runtime overhead. This post compares current main against lld 22.1, mold, and wild.

Headline: a Release+Asserts clang --gc-sections link is 1.34x as fast as lld 22.1; Chromium debug with --gdb-index is 1.09x as fast. mold and wild are still ahead — the last section explains why.

The C and C++ standards leave nearly every detail to the implementation. C23 §6.7.3.2:

An implementation may allocate any addressable storage unit large enough to hold a bit-field. If enough space remains, a bit-field that immediately follows another bit-field in a structure shall be packed into adjacent bits of the same unit. If insufficient space remains, whether a bit-field that does not fit is put into the next unit or overlaps adjacent units is implementation-defined. The order of allocation of bit-fields within a unit (high-order to low-order or low-order to high-order) is implementation-defined. The alignment of the addressable storage unit is unspecified

C++ is also terse — [class.bit]p1:

Allocation of bit-fields within a class object is implementation-defined. Alignment of bit-fields is implementation-defined. Bit-fields are packed into some addressable allocation unit.

Most architectures encode direct branch/call instructions with a PC-relative displacement. This post discusses a specific category of branch relocations: those used for direct function calls and tail calls. Some architectures use two ELF relocation types for a call instruction:

# i386, x86-64
call foo              # R_386_PC32, R_X86_64_PC32
call foo@plt          # R_386_PLT32, R_X86_64_PLT32

# m68k
bsr.l foo             # R_68K_PC32
bsr.l foo@plt         # R_68K_PLT32

# s390/s390x
brasl %r14, foo       # R_390_PC32DBL
brasl %r14, foo@plt   # R_390_PLT32DBL

# sparc
call    foo, 0        # not PIC: R_SPARC_WDISP30
call    foo, 0        # gas -KPIC: R_SPARC_WPLT30

For those unfamiliar, lld is the LLVM linker, supporting PE/COFF, ELF, Mach-O, and WebAssembly ports. These object file formats differ significantly, and each port must follow the conventions of the platform's system linker. As a result, the ports share limited code (diagnostics, memory allocation, etc) and have largely separate reviewer groups.

With LLVM 22.1 releasing soon, I've added some notes to the https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/release/22.x/lld/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst as an lld/ELF maintainer. As usual, I've reviewed almost all the patches not authored by me.

For the first time, I used an LLM agent (Claude Code) to help look through commits (git log release/21.x..release/22.x -- lld/ELF) and draft the release notes. Despite my request to only read lld/ELF changes, Claude Code also crafted notes for other ports, which I retained since their release notes had been quite sparse for several releases. Changes back ported to the 21.x release are removed (git log --oneline llvmorg-22-init..llvmorg-21.1.8 -- lld).

I'll delve into some of the key changes.

Branch instructions on most architectures use PC-relative addressing with a limited range. When the target is too far away, the branch becomes "out of range" and requires special handling.

Consider a large binary where main() at address 0x10000 calls foo() at address 0x8010000-over 128MiB away. On AArch64, the bl instruction can only reach ±128MiB, so this call cannot be encoded directly. Without proper handling, the linker would fail with an error like "relocation out of range." The toolchain must handle this transparently to produce correct executables.

This article explores how compilers, assemblers, and linkers work together to solve the long branch problem.

• Compiler (IR to assembly): Handles branches within a function that exceed the range of conditional branch instructions
• Assembler (assembly to relocatable file): Handles branches within a section where the distance is known at assembly time
• Linker: Handles cross-section and cross-object branches discovered during final layout

I've created pr-shadow with vibe coding, a tool that maintains a shadow branch for GitHub pull requests (PR) that never requires force-pushing. This addresses pain points I described in Reflections on LLVM's switch to GitHub pull requests#Patch evolution.